![]() |
|
|
|
| July 14 , 2003 | |
Commentary
and Planning Ideas, Market Perspective, and Market Review are |
|
| Investors began 2003 worried about the possibility of a double-dip U.S. recession. Very weak economic news from January through March offered little encouragement. Equally unsettling was the geopolitical roller coaster occurring during the year’s first few months (Iraq, SARS, North Korea, etc.), but hopes rose as the second quarter began due to significant improvement in news on Iraq and SARS. |
|
| Economic Review* | |
Questions about the health of the global economy remained unresolved for the second quarter in a row. In the U.S., despite robust housing markets and refinancing opportunities across much of the country, consumer sentiment remained soft, and consumer spending news was grim. Data releases such as retail sales and personal consumption expenditures confirmed that the trend in spending was well below where it typically is early in an economic recovery. Reports on business spending were also discouraging. Low inventory levels notwithstanding, most measures of capital spending (durable goods and industrial production, for example) were weak. The widely tracked “Institute for Supply Management Manufacturing Business Survey” reported continued weak activity, citing weakness in many sectors, pressure from natural gas prices, SARS concerns in Asia, and the impact of a declining dollar. Manufacturing employment has declined for 35 consecutive months and has shed 2.6 million jobs, or 15% of its total. |
|
Conditions were also uncertain outside of the U.S. The International Monetary Fund noted that any economic recovery in Europe would likely be postponed because of a lack of structural reform, high corporate debt, a stronger euro, and the aging population. Additionally, most economists believe that Japan’s economy continued to idle during the second quarter. |
|
| The policy responses to this economic weakness were aggressive and welcomed by investors. The Federal Reserve Board, declaring that the U.S. economy has “yet to exhibit sustainable growth,” cut the Federal funds rate to 1%, its lowest point since 1958. In addition, the Bush administration and Congress passed aggressive tax cuts in an attempt to stimulate economic growth. Overseas, the European Central Bank responded to a weak economic start to 2003 by cutting its key short-term rate to 2%. | |
| In addition to fiscal and monetary stimuli, a further bright spot was that inflation statistics released during the quarter seemed to indicate stabilization of prices, which appeased worriers of both deflation and inflation. Thus, aggressive monetary and fiscal policies could be pursued around the globe without the usual caveat of inflation concerns. | |
| Market Perspective | |
| About three months ago, in mid-April, we wondered why the hoped for “bounce” in stock prices had dissipated after only a few strong weeks of upward prices in spite of quite positive news about the Iraq war. Nonetheless, we thought that stock prices were about right given continuing economic weakness, challenges to company profitability, and the ongoing threat of global terrorism. |
|
This past quarter again offered evidence that stock markets hate uncertainty. The resolution of a large block of uncertainty about the duration and outcome of war in Iraq lifted a huge weight off valuations. So as it turned out, the initial bounce was only pausing in late March and had higher to fly. Since mid-April, in less than three months, the U.S. market has climbed a further 14%-23%, depending on which measure you choose, and foreign stocks are up similarly (data are as of this writing). As mentioned above, this very large move has benefited from not only significant reduction in geopolitical uncertainty, but also concurrent governmental economic stimulus. It also comes on the heels of a three-year global bear market which brought down equities’ prices significantly (the broad market) and even dramatically (technology and telecommunications), which attracted buyers. Finally, recent reductions of tax rates in the U.S. are not only putting more dollars in our pockets; they are also increasing the attractiveness of stocks by reducing the tax rate on capital gains and most common stock dividends. The higher after-tax cash flows justify higher valuations. |
|
| To summarize the case being made by the bulls, they say the market is not merely responding to the relatively quick end to the major hostilities in Iraq; it also is foretelling a marked upturn in the global economy. Convinced that all the bad economic numbers are backward looking, the bulls maintain that the best indicator is the market itself. Finally, the bulls note stock market rallies can become self-fulfilling by raising consumer and corporate confidence, thus stimulating the economy and corporate profits. |
|
| Market bears have a different assessment. They stress that the second quarter rally occurred against a backdrop of economic statistics and corporate earnings reports that was not very inspiring. The bears submit that the surge in stock prices in the absence of much pick-up in corporate earnings has pushed valuation measures to caution levels for investors. The most common measure of whether stocks are cheap or expensive is the price of the broad Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index compared with the earnings of the companies in the index. That ratio has hit 32 in recent weeks. That happens to be the same level at which the index traded when the stock bubble burst about three years ago. | |
| Bears point to another stock market warning light, investor sentiment, which measures whether investors are gloomy or enthusiastic. A common measure of investor sentiment is a survey conducted by market research outfit Investors Intelligence, which monitors whether investment newsletters are bullish, bearish, or in between. That survey shows that bulls now represent about 70% of those who are clearly bullish or bearish, an unusually high percentage. Three weeks ago, before a brief market pullback, bulls were almost 80%, the highest level since the spring of 1987, a period that preceded the crash of 1987. In case there is a need for clarification, the measure is interpreted inversely. Thus, a high percent of bullishness is actually negative for market performance, indicating newsletter writers are also capable of "irrational exuberance". | |
| As usual, good arguments are lined up on both sides of the issue of near-term market performance. As is our custom, Caves & Associates is reluctant to disseminate short-term forecasts because they are so unreliable. In general, our sentiment has gone from bullish at the start of the second quarter, to cautious, due to the recent strong rally relatively unsupported by underlying improvement of investment fundamentals. Given there remains a significant amount of uncertainty in the world, from all regions including the Middle East, we think news of an economic rebound and corporate earnings growth is crucial for current prices to be sustained and even advance further. So we are glad for recent strongly positive market results but only partially persuaded the time is at hand to herald a new bull market. We think there are good reasons for bullish investors to see light at the end of the tunnel and be optimistic that global economies are recovering. We also recognize the market is very forward-looking, usually acting on conditions as they are expected to be in 6-12 months. And the market is usually right. Nonetheless, we are maintaining a market neutral posture and waiting for some confirming fundamental economic news before considering some overweighting of stocks. Therefore, we are recommending investors maintain allocations at strategic targets for the time being. | |
| * Thanks go to the Managers Funds for their review of global economics presented here. | |
| Back to Market Reviews |