In many respects this quarter was simply a carryover from
the fourth quarter of last year, and many previous quarters, as well.
The story seems well told by now: stocks outperform bonds, growth
outperforms value, and technology trounces all sectors.
While these trends began reversing dramatically in Mid-March, the
quarter’s results remained high due to astounding returns for the first two
and one-half months. The attached
table summarizes data for the quarter.
Equities Review
Technology continued to outperform other sectors with a
return of 18.4% for the quarter. The
S&P 500 Index of large company stocks was able to generate only a meager
gain of 2.3%. Meanwhile small company stocks continued their recent
outperformance with the Russell 2000 index of small company U.S. stocks posting
a 7.1% quarterly return. Results
for the average diversified U. S. stock fund, at 6.8%, were better than the
S&P 500 Index which reflected funds’ generally higher exposure than the
index to the technology sector and smaller company stocks.
Value investors continued to be upstaged by their growth
counterparts. The average large
value fund simply broke even for the quarter, while the average large growth
fund returned 8.3%. The return
disparity was even more pronounced among smaller capitalized stocks with the
small value sector returning 4.8% and the small growth sector returning a very
strong 15.8%.
Against 19 currencies, the U.S. dollar strengthened 2.2%.
The dollar appreciation hindered unhedged U.S. dollar investors by
decreasing overseas local currency returns.
Nevertheless, European stocks posted a respectable 7.9% return and bested
other foreign markets. Emerging
markets returned 3.7%, while Pacific region stocks fell 1.4%. The drop in Asian
stock markets reversed a four-quarter trend of outperformance relative to the
European markets and dragged down the average for diversified international
funds, which gained only 2.7%.
U.S. bond markets generated relatively better returns than
in previous quarters. Further rate
hikes by the Fed continued the trend of higher short-term rates, but longer-term
rates appeared to have, at least temporally, halted their upward march over the
past eighteen months. As a result,
short-term rates now yield more than long-term rates resulting in the seldom
seen “inverted yield curve”. It
seems at this juncture that both the Fed and Caves & Associates are more
concerned about inflation than the bond market.
The discrepancy in interest rate movement was reflected in
returns: the long-term government sector returned 5.3%, while the short-term
government sector returned only 1.2%. Meanwhile,
a rise in corporate bond defaults lead to increased yield premiums for
non-investment grade bonds and therefore to underperformance in the high yield
market. The average high yield fund
lost 1.5% for the quarter.
Hurt by the appreciating dollar, international government bonds returned only 1.3% for the quarter, as measured by the Salomon Brothers index. Nevertheless, many developing countries saw credit improvement in the face of higher commodity prices. This improvement resulted in a 7.3% return for the average emerging markets bond fund.
First
Quarter 2000 Market Review
Table
of Stock and Bond Returns
|
||||||
|
|
|
Period Return to 3/31/00* |
||||
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
One Year |
||
U.S. Stocks |
|
|
|
|
||
|
S&P 500 Index ** |
|
2.3% |
|
17.9% |
||
|
Average Diversified Equity Mutual Fund |
|
6.8% |
|
36.0% |
||
|
Russell 2000 # |
|
7.1% |
|
37.4% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sector Mutual Funds |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Technology |
|
18.4% |
|
139.7% |
||
|
Health |
|
18.2% |
|
45.5% |
||
|
Communications |
|
10.8% |
|
64.5% |
||
|
Financial |
|
-0.2% |
|
-4.1% |
||
|
Real Estate |
|
1.8% |
|
2.7% |
||
|
Natural Resources |
|
9.2% |
|
32.6% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Foreign Stocks |
|
|
|
|
||
|
MSCI Europe, Australia & Far East (EAFE) ## |
|
-0.1% |
|
25.1% |
||
|
Average Diversified Equity Mutual Fund |
|
2.7% |
|
49.2% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Regional/Specialty Mutual Funds |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Europe |
|
7.9% |
|
38.1% |
||
|
Diversified Pacific/Asia |
|
-1.4% |
|
76.5% |
||
|
Diversified Emerging Markets |
|
3.7% |
|
66. 66.3% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
U.S. Bonds |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Lehman Brothers Intermediate Gov’t Bond Index *** |
|
1.6% |
|
2.4% |
||
|
Lehman Brothers Intermediate Corp. Bond Index d |
|
1.2% |
|
1.4% |
||
|
Intermediate Municipal Bond Mutual Funds |
|
1.8% |
|
-0.9% |
||
|
High Yield Bond Mutual Funds |
|
-1.5% |
|
-0.5% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Foreign Bonds |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Salomon Brothers Non-U.S. World Gov’t Bond Index ### |
|
1.3% |
|
2.4% |
||
*
Mutual fund return data are from Morningstar.
**
Capitalization-weighted index of 500 very large U.S. companies.
The 500 are chosen to achieve a fair cross-section of U.S. industrial and
service sectors. Recent median
capitalization of approximately $90 billion.
***
Lehman Brothers index of U.S. Treasury bond total returns (i.e., interest
plus or minus change in
d
Lehman Brothers index of U.S.
investment grade corporate bond total returns (i.e., interest plus or minus
change in price). Bonds in index have intermediate maturity of about 4-7 years.
#
Index of small U.S. companies. Recent
median capitalization of approximately $800 million. Somewhat overweighted toward financial stocks.
##
International stock index indicating return of large foreign companies of
20 major developed countries (Japan, UK, and Germany have the highest
weightings). Returns are converted
to U.S. dollars. No emerging market
stocks are included.
###
Salomon Brothers index of total return of foreign government bonds issued
by major developed foreign countries (Japan, Germany, France, and UK have the
highest weightings). Returns are converted to US dollars.